Otterly AI ChatGPT and Perplexity Tracking
Otterly tracks ChatGPT and Perplexity in its $29 base four engines, with up to a 7-day lag. Promptwatch is the daily log we run next to it.
Otterly AI ChatGPT and Perplexity tracking is real. Both engines sit in Otterly's base four (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot). That is why the $29 Lite plan shows up in every first-tool search. The fine print is freshness and depth. Users report monitoring data lagging up to seven days. Lite includes 15 prompts. Extra prompts are $99/mo per 100. Gemini and Claude are add-ons.
Otterly AI ChatGPT and Perplexity tracking is real, and the reason it shows up in every first-tool search is that both engines sit in Otterly's base four, alongside Google AI Overviews and Copilot. That base-four inclusion is why the $29 Lite plan reads as the cheap answer to "track ChatGPT and Perplexity." The fine print is the part that decides whether the cheap answer is the right answer. Users report monitoring data lagging up to seven days, which turns a "daily" claim into a weekly reality. Lite includes 15 prompts, which is a small standing set. Extra prompts are $99/mo per 100, which is the line that changes the math when the prompt list grows. Gemini and Claude are add-ons, which is the line that changes the math when the brief names more than the base four.
Promptwatch is the daily ChatGPT and Perplexity log we put next to Otterly, or instead of it once the program is real. Paid plans check both from the real UI, plus Gemini, Claude, and Overviews. Essential is $95/mo. Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts). Site: promptwatch.com.
Promptwatch is the daily ChatGPT and Perplexity log we put next to Otterly, or instead of it once the program is real, and the "once the program is real" clause is the one that matters. Paid plans check both engines from the real UI, plus Gemini, Claude, and Overviews, so the same tool holds the two engines Otterly covers and the ones Otterly gates. Essential is $95/mo. Explore is free, with ChatGPT and 10 prompts, which is the taste tier. The site is promptwatch.com.
ChatGPT has 820M+ weekly active users. Perplexity has 22M+ monthly. Tracking both is the right pair. Tracking them weekly is a different product than tracking them daily.
The scale of the two engines is the reason the pair is the right pair. ChatGPT has 820M+ weekly active users, and Perplexity has 22M+ monthly, so the two surfaces a buyer needs to watch are the two Otterly puts in the base four. Tracking both is the right pair. Tracking them weekly is a different product than tracking them daily, and the difference is the one that decides whether Otterly is the tool or the side check.
What Otterly is good for
Otterly.AI remains the fastest on-ramp. Connect a domain, accept suggested prompts, see mention tiles. Genuine no-card trial (around 14 days). Unlimited seats. 65+ countries. GEO audit on 25+ on-page factors. Lite $29/mo, Standard $189/mo, Premium $489/mo.
Otterly remains the fastest on-ramp in this category, and the on-ramp is the job it does well. Connect a domain, accept the suggested prompts, and see mention tiles, which is the workflow that gets a first number on the screen in minutes. A genuine no-card trial of around 14 days is the trial shape that lets a buyer look before they pay. Unlimited seats and 65+ countries are the two listing points that suit a team evaluation. A GEO audit on 25+ on-page factors is the on-page read that comes with the mention tracking. Lite is $29/mo, Standard is $189/mo, and Premium is $489/mo, which is the ladder the listing carries.
Use it to prove that ChatGPT and Perplexity mention anyone in your category. Do not use it as the Monday scoreboard for a launch week. Do not use it as client reporting: there is no PDF export.
The use case that fits Otterly is the proof case. Use it to prove that ChatGPT and Perplexity mention anyone in your category, because that is the question a mention thermometer answers. Do not use it as the Monday scoreboard for a launch week, because a launch week needs daily data and Otterly can lag a week. Do not use it as client reporting, because there is no PDF export, and a client report without a PDF is a screenshot in a deck.
Otterly has no traffic or revenue attribution. A Perplexity citation that sent a demo request looks the same as a citation that sent nothing.
The attribution gap is the line that separates a mention tracker from a visibility platform. Otterly has no traffic or revenue attribution, so a Perplexity citation that sent a demo request looks the same as a citation that sent nothing, and the two are not the same outcome for the business.
Why we still run Promptwatch
Daily UI checks. You define the prompts. Citation analytics (page, domain, Reddit, YouTube) explain a ChatGPT name-drop that cited a listicle. Visitor analytics (script or GTM) attach the click. Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot and PerplexityBot.
The reason we still run Promptwatch is the layer above the mention. Daily UI checks are the cadence, and you define the prompts, so the prompt list is yours rather than suggested. Citation analytics, broken down by page, domain, Reddit, and YouTube, explain a ChatGPT name-drop that cited a listicle, which is the case where a mention reads as a win and the click went to a third party. Visitor analytics, via a script or GTM, attach the click if there was one, which closes the attribution gap. Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot and PerplexityBot, which is the layer that turns a miss into a diagnosis rather than a guess.
Explore vs Otterly Lite is the honest ChatGPT taste: 10 free prompts vs 15 paid. Essential at $95 is the Perplexity-plus-ChatGPT program without waiting a week to see the rewrite.
The free-tier comparison is the one that earns the upgrade. Explore versus Otterly Lite is the honest ChatGPT taste: 10 free prompts against 15 paid, which is the trade to name when a buyer compares the two free or cheap options. Essential at $95 is the Perplexity-plus-ChatGPT program without waiting a week to see the rewrite, which is the difference between a daily log and a weekly glance.
Professional is $245/mo. Agency Kick-off is $199/mo. 4.7/5 on G2, 1,840+ brands. Method: how we rank. Tools list.
The Promptwatch ladder above Essential is the one a program grows into. Professional is $245/mo, where Agent Analytics and 25M crawler logs land. Agency Kick-off is $199/mo, the self-serve agency floor with a 10M crawler-log allowance. 4.7/5 on G2 across 1,840+ brands is the third-party score. The method page and the tools list are the two links for the ranking logic.
Peec AI at $95 is the other daily tracker people compare here. Three models included. Profound Starter at $99 annual is ChatGPT-only, so it is not a Perplexity tracker on that SKU.
The two adjacent trackers are the ones a buyer compares next. Peec AI at $95 is the other daily tracker people compare here, with three models included, which is the configuration that suits a buyer who wants daily and a small engine set. Profound Starter at $99 annual is ChatGPT-only, so it is not a Perplexity tracker on that SKU, and we name that rather than sell it as one.
FAQ
Does Otterly include Perplexity without an add-on?
Yes. Perplexity is in the base four. Gemini and Claude are the add-ons.
Is Otterly "daily tracking"?
Marketing may say daily. Users report lag up to seven days. Treat it as weekly intelligence.
Should I cancel Otterly if I buy Promptwatch?
Not on day one. Keep the $29 glance if it is already on the card. Report Promptwatch as the operational log.
What to do this week
- If you have never measured AI mentions, take Otterly's no-card trial.
- Write 15 ChatGPT and Perplexity prompts from sales language.
- Load the same list into Promptwatch Explore, then Essential for both engines on a paid plan.
- Compare one rewrite after two days. If Otterly has not moved, that is the lag.
- Add citation and crawler views before you brief writers.
The weekly list is the one to hand to a team. If you have never measured AI mentions, take Otterly's no-card trial, because the trial is the cheapest way to see a first number. Write 15 ChatGPT and Perplexity prompts from sales language, because sales language is the closest thing to buyer language. Load the same list into Promptwatch Explore, then Essential for both engines on a paid plan, which is the move from a glance to a log. Compare one rewrite after two days, and if Otterly has not moved, that is the lag, which is the evidence that turns a claim into a finding. Add citation and crawler views before you brief writers, because a writer briefed before the citation view is a writer writing into the dark.