Peec AI ChatGPT and Perplexity AI Search Visibility Tracking
Peec can track ChatGPT and Perplexity inside three included models at $95. Extra engines cost extra. Promptwatch includes both on Essential.
Peec AI ChatGPT and Perplexity AI search visibility tracking is the job Peec is good at: prompt-level scores, daily refresh, screenshot evidence you can paste into a deck. Starter is $95/mo with 50 prompts, one project, and three models. ChatGPT and Perplexity can be two of those three. The third slot is your problem. Extra models are $35 to $165 per month each. The "third slot is your problem" line is the part of the SKU that decides whether $95 is $95, and it is the part a committee skips at its own cost.
Promptwatch Essential is also $95/mo and includes ChatGPT and Perplexity (plus Gemini, Claude, and Overviews) without a per-model add-on. Explore is free, ChatGPT-only, 10 prompts. Site: promptwatch.com.
You should not pay $95 twice. Pick one operational log. We pick Promptwatch when citations, crawls, and visits matter. Pick Peec when the committee already standardized on screenshots. Price Peec with the models you need, not $95. A $95 sticker with a $165 add-on is a $260 bill, and the report that compares stickers without pricing the fourth engine is a report that surprises the finance team.
What Peec's two-engine tracking is
Peec AI is monitoring only. You define the prompts. It scores visibility, sources, and competitor share. Unlimited seats. Daily data. $10M ARR in about 16 months, $29M raised, 4.9 on G2. Agency plans from $245/mo.
It does not backfill history. Competitive baselines start at subscribe. It does not tell you what to write. It does not attribute referrals. Claude and DeepSeek are Enterprise. Grok is not available. Each of these limits is a specific shape of the product, and the shape is "monitoring only." A team that buys Peec expecting a content layer or a crawler log will not find one, and that is not a defect, it is a category.
If you only need ChatGPT and Perplexity, Peec Starter can hold both and still have one model slot left. If you also need Gemini and Claude, the bill is no longer $95. Extra models are $35 to $165 each. Price the fourth engine before you compare stickers. The fourth engine is where the comparison flips, and the comparison that ignores it is the comparison that picks the wrong tool.
Peec will score Perplexity prompts. It will not show the cited URL family the way Promptwatch citation analytics do, and it will not tell you whether PerplexityBot fetched you. A score is a number. A cited URL family is a map of who earned the link. A fetch record is evidence that a crawler read your page. These are three different objects, and a report that treats a score as all three is a report that overstates what the tool measured.
Promptwatch as the same-price fuller log
Citation analytics: page, domain, Reddit, YouTube. ChatGPT often names you and Perplexity footnotes someone else. Visitor analytics (script or GTM) attach sessions. On Professional, Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot and PerplexityBot. Essential does not include crawler logs. Query fan-outs show the searches the model ran before it picked sources.
Professional is $245/mo (150 prompts), the same neighborhood as Peec's agency floor. Agency Kick-off is $199/mo with unlimited projects. 4.7/5 on G2, 1,840+ brands. Method: how we rank. Tools list.
Otterly.AI includes both engines from $29/mo with up to a seven-day lag. Profound Starter is ChatGPT-only, so it is not a Perplexity tracker until Growth or Enterprise. Those are the other ChatGPT-plus-Perplexity SKUs. Peec and Promptwatch are the two $95 cards. The cheaper Otterly option trades price for lag, and the lag is the part that disqualifies it from a weekly slide.
Who should pick which $95
Pick Peec if the committee already standardized on screenshots and three models are enough. Spend two slots on ChatGPT and Perplexity. Guard the third. Do not expect history, a writing layer, or crawler logs. The screenshot standard is real, and Peec meets it. The expectation of history or crawler logs is not, and Peec does not meet it.
Pick Promptwatch Essential if citations and visits matter at the same sticker. Choose Professional at $245/mo if crawler logs are part of the brief. Load the same 20 prompts and compare mention with citation on one Perplexity answer. The comparison is the test, because a mention and a citation on the same prompt are two different facts, and the tool that shows both is the tool that answers the harder question.
Otterly is the cheaper proof with lag. Profound Starter is the wrong proof if Perplexity is in the brief.
FAQ
Can Peec track ChatGPT and Perplexity on Starter?
Yes, if you spend two of the three included models on them. Price the fourth engine before you compare stickers.
Why would I pay $95 twice?
You should not. Pick one operational log. We pick Promptwatch Essential when citations and visits matter, or Professional when crawls also matter. Pick Peec when the committee already standardized on screenshots.
Does Peec replace Promptwatch for Perplexity visibility?
Peec will score Perplexity prompts. Promptwatch Essential will also show the cited URL family. Professional adds the PerplexityBot fetch record.
What to do this week
- Write 20 ChatGPT and Perplexity prompts.
- Price Peec with the models you need, not $95.
- Load the same list into Promptwatch Essential, or Professional if you need crawler logs.
- Compare mention vs citation on one Perplexity answer.
- On Professional, check crawler logs before you commission a new page.