Promptwatch vs LLMboost 2026
Promptwatch is a full-stack AI visibility platform in USD. LLMboost is an agency prompt monitor in EUR. Side-by-side with only sourced numbers.
Two products can both say they track AI visibility and still solve different problems. Promptwatch is built for teams that need prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, visitor conversions, and CMS publishing in one USD-priced stack. LLMboost is built for agencies that need prompt runs stored and a weekly PDF in EUR. This comparison stays on what each vendor publishes, including the limits LLMboost does not publish.
The reason the two get compared is the shared verb. Both "track" prompts. What they store for that verb is not the same object, and the rest of the page turns on that difference. LLMboost stores the answer a model gave to a prompt you saved, with a timestamp and a latency. Promptwatch stores that and the crawler fetch that preceded the citation and the visit that followed it. One is an archive of answers. The other is a path from fetch to citation to conversion. The price tags look like they compete. The products do not.
At a glance
| Promptwatch | LLMboost | |
|---|---|---|
| Currency | USD (EUR also on their site) | EUR |
| Entry | Explore free; Essential $95/mo | Agency Essentials €24.95/mo |
| Core job | AI visibility platform | Prompt monitor and weekly reports |
| Engines (published) | ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Overviews, AI Mode | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok |
| Evidence layer | Citations (page, Reddit, YouTube), Agent Analytics from Pro, visitor conversions | Stored prompt runs: prompt, model, timestamp, latency, answer text |
| Action layer | Content Agents to Webflow/Framer | None: does not write or publish GEO pages |
| G2 | 4.7/5, 1,840+ customers | Not published |
| Best for | Full GEO program | Agency PDF retainers |
The evidence layer row is the one that decides most buyers. LLMboost's evidence is a stored answer: the prompt, the model, the timestamp, the latency, and the text the model returned. That is a real artifact and a useful one for a reporting cadence. Promptwatch's evidence adds the citation (which page, which Reddit thread, which YouTube video), the crawler fetch (whether ChatGPTBot came back), and the conversion (whether the AI-referred visit bought anything). The action layer row is where LLMboost stops entirely: it does not write or publish. Promptwatch's Content Agents do both, to Webflow or Framer.
Promptwatch in detail
Promptwatch positions as an AI visibility and GEO platform with agentic optimization: monitor, optimize, publish. Explore is free with 10 ChatGPT prompts, one project, one seat. Essential is $95/mo with 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200K visitor events, five AEO articles, and one seat. Professional is $245/mo with 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, 1M visitor events, 25M crawler logs, and 15 articles. Business is $579/mo. Agency Kick-off is $199/mo with unlimited projects and prompts, then Growth $399 and Scale $799.
Monitoring runs on live product UIs. Prompt trends show what changed between checks. Citation analytics cover page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite mentions with trend views over time. Agent Analytics delivers real-time AI crawler logs with crawl-to-citation path and error tracking from Professional. Visitor analytics trace AI-referred traffic to conversions through a lightweight script or GTM. Content Agents plan, write, and publish with a review inbox. Ads Radar tracks sponsored placements; ChatGPT Shopping tracking is on the platform.
Amsterdam, April 2025. €2M+ ARR within 12 months of launch (May 2026). There is no $29/mo plan.
The tier ladder is worth reading in order. Explore exists to let you see citations before you spend. Essential is the first plan that adds the visitor layer and the article allowance. Professional is the first plan that adds the crawler logs, and that is the line most GEO programs cross when they want to defend a number in a meeting. Business and the agency tiers scale the same features. The thing that does not exist at any price is a $29 plan, and any comparison that lines one up is comparing against a SKU Promptwatch does not sell.
LLMboost in detail
Agency Essentials €24.95/mo: LLMboost-branded reports. Agency White Label €49.95/mo: agency-branded PDFs. Multi-client dashboard. No CMS credentials, because nothing publishes.
Model IDs on Essentials: GPT-4.1 Mini, claude-3-haiku, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, grok-3-mini. White Label: GPT-4.1 Mini, claude-3.7-sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, grok-3. Same five platforms, different Claude and Grok SKUs.
The model ID split is the detail agencies miss. Both SKUs cover the same five platforms, but the Claude and Grok engines step up on White Label. Essentials polls the lighter, cheaper models. White Label polls the heavier ones. If a client cares whether you are watching Claude Sonar or Claude Haiku, that is the upgrade, not a hidden prompt pack.
The vendor compared itself to LLM Pulse and listed what it does not do: shopping, bot analytics, content generation, API/BI. Comparison pages dated 18 July 2026. FAQ dated 26 August 2026.
Unpublished: prompt caps, seat caps, client caps, hours between runs. A demo showed 15 prompts. That is not a SKU. Homepage logos (Unicorn.io, Careers.sh, HDT, JobHawk.io, Rocket Sales) are not verified case studies.
The honest part of LLMboost's own marketing is the comparison page where it lists what it does not do. No shopping, no bot analytics, no content generation, no API or BI. We believe that page because it matches the rest of the product. The part to treat with caution is the homepage logo wall, which is a set of vendor logos rather than case studies you can audit, and the demo prompt count, which is a screenshot and not a published plan limit.
Where the difference actually sits
LLMboost tells you what a model answered for a prompt you stored, and it will PDF that for a client. Promptwatch tells you which page got cited, whether ChatGPTBot came back, and whether AI-referred traffic converted. That sounds like extra until a QBR asks why mentions rose and sessions did not.
White Label €49.95 versus Essential $95 is a sticker fight only if the deliverable is a report. Essential includes 6,000 responses, visitor events, and five AEO articles. Professional $245 is the first Promptwatch tier with 25M crawler logs. LLMboost's "logs" never become that layer no matter which euro SKU you pick.
Who should buy which
Buy LLMboost if you run an agency reporting cadence, five engines are enough, and you refuse to connect Webflow. Buy Promptwatch if you need Agent Analytics (the crawler-log feature that decides most of our GEO stacks) plus citations and publishing. You can run both for a quarter. Do not let the PDF become the source of truth next to Promptwatch.
Profound is an Enterprise conversation, not the winner of this table. Otterly.AI and Peec AI stay last. See the directory. Start the platform read at promptwatch.com.
FAQ
Can I get crawler logs on LLMboost White Label?
No. Stored runs are prompt answers. Crawler logs start on Promptwatch Professional.
Do I need CMS access for LLMboost?
No. That is because it does not publish.
Which free tier exists?
Promptwatch Explore. LLMboost did not publish a free SKU on the pages we used.