Promptwatch vs Qwairy vs Temso vs Superlines: 2026 GEO Comparison
Promptwatch against three lookalike GEO stacks: Qwairy's credit meter, Temso's thin $89 Starter, Superlines' 3-engine euro SKU.
Qwairy, Temso, Superlines, and Promptwatch combine AI visibility with an action layer. The differences are engine caps, credit rules, crawler detail, and publishing. Compare the plan the team would actually run, not a broad homepage list. The homepage of every product in this cluster shows the same shape: prompts, a cockpit, MCP, maybe bot visits, maybe an article draft. The invoice is where they stop rhyming.
Google AI Overviews also need first-party context. Use Google's AI features documentation and Search Console alongside any of these products. None of these four replaces the free Google surface for understanding your own Overviews performance.
Qwairy: broad access with a credit meter
Qwairy lists more than 10 engines across live-interface and API sampling. Starter is €79 per month for 100 prompts, 1,300 credits, one workspace, and MCP. A monitoring query costs one credit per model; a content brief costs 50. Analyses pause at zero, so calculate monthly queries before comparing engine counts. A credit meter that halts the workspace is the part most buyers underestimate until a Monday morning when the dashboard goes dark.
The catalog documents response analysis, citation sources, sentiment, Content Studio, diagnostics, and search connectors. Crawler analytics, Looker, and alerts start on Business at €449. Promptwatch-style named crawler logs, crawl-to-citation paths, and bot errors are not documented. Claude, Mistral, and DeepSeek use API sampling. The engine list is broad on the marketing page and narrower in the live interface, and the gap between those two is what the credit math is hiding.
Temso: the closest operational match
Temso documents daily live-interface tracking, citations, competitor benchmarks, and bot analytics from Search Console plus server logs. It also lists audits, an execution agent, CMS publishing, MCP, and unlimited projects and seats.
Starter is $89 per month for three models, 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 10,000 bot visits, and five content pieces. Growth is $199 for all models, 150 prompts, 25 million bot visits, REST API, and Looker. Claude is an add-on sold in prompt packs. AI-referral conversions and a Promptwatch-style review inbox are not documented. The loop matches Promptwatch on a slide, but the conversion layer that turns visibility into traffic evidence is missing from the docs.
Superlines: live interfaces with a three-engine cap
Superlines samples live interfaces and tracks daily prompts, share of voice, and citation sources. It also lists an Action Center, article generation, schema optimization, bot analytics, web tracking, and MCP.
Starter costs €79 per month for 50 prompts, one brand, one month of history, and three engines. It includes five articles but no export. Pro is €199 with exports and monthly audits. Growth is €379 with API access and weekly audits. Self-serve stays capped at three engines; up to 10 requires Enterprise.
The listing supports bot analytics for Superlines, but it does not specify named crawler coverage, crawl-to-citation paths, or error tracking. It also does not document AI-referred conversion analytics or a CMS publishing loop equivalent to Promptwatch Content Agents. One month of history on Starter is the constraint that bites anyone who has to show a quarter of data.
Promptwatch: evidence from prompt to conversion
Promptwatch Explore is free for 10 ChatGPT prompts. Essential costs $95 per month for 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200,000 visitor events, and five AEO articles. The paid monitoring set includes ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
Citation analytics reaches pages, domains, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite mentions. Visitor analytics tracks referrals and conversions. Professional at $245 per month adds Agent Analytics for named crawlers, crawl-to-citation paths, and errors. Content Agents use a review inbox and publish to Webflow or Framer. The chain from prompt to citation to crawl to visitor to published page is the part the lookalikes only half-build.
The plan-level comparison
| Product | Entry plan | Engine or usage constraint | Crawler and visitor position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promptwatch | Essential $95/mo | 50 prompts and 6,000 responses | Visitor conversions; named crawler logs start on Professional $245/mo |
| Temso | Starter $89/mo | Three models; Claude add-on | Bot analytics listed; conversions not documented |
| Superlines | Starter €79/mo | Three engines and one month of history | Bot analytics listed; named-bot depth not documented |
| Qwairy | Starter €79/mo | 1,300 credits; analyses pause at zero | Crawler analytics starts on Business |
Qwairy fits a bounded monitor set that suits its credits and mixed sampling. Temso suits teams that value audits, unlimited seats, and bot analytics. Superlines works for teams that need three live-interface engines and little Starter history.
Promptwatch is the stronger default when one team owns monitoring, technical diagnosis, traffic attribution, and content. Essential is close to the lowest entry prices for monitoring, citations, visitor analytics, and content. Professional is the first brand plan that adds the named crawler layer. The decision is whether the buyer wants a tracker or a stack, and the four products split cleanly on that line.
FAQ
Why does Superlines advertise more engines than Starter includes?
The full list is an engine menu. Self-serve plans let buyers choose three, while coverage of up to 10 engines is listed for Enterprise. The Superlines review separates platform coverage from plan coverage.
Is Temso Starter cheaper than Promptwatch Essential?
Yes, by the listed monthly prices: $89 versus $95. Temso Starter covers three models and 10,000 bot visits. Promptwatch Essential includes its broader paid engine set, 200,000 visitor events, and five AEO articles. Claude costs extra with Temso.
Should Qwairy and Promptwatch be used together?
Their monitoring functions overlap. A second subscription is justified only if Qwairy has a module the team has tested and cannot replace. Otherwise, one connected record is easier to audit. Promptwatch plans are listed at promptwatch.com.