Qwairy vs Peec AI (2026): Checkbox Suite or a Tracker That Ships
Qwairy wants to be a GEO OS. Peec wants screenshots. Promptwatch sits in the third column because both still leave a loop open.
Qwairy sells six modules. Peec AI sells prompt-level tracking with a screenshot on every row. One is a vibe-coded OS. The other is a finished dashboard with a model-add-on bill. Promptwatch is the column if you wanted both measurement and a publish loop.
Google's AI features guidance still covers Overviews. It does not store ChatGPT or Perplexity answers on a prompt you typed.
This pairing is a category mistake that buyers keep making. Qwairy looks bigger because the sitemap has more nouns. Peec looks smaller because it only does monitoring. In practice Peec is the product you can put in front of a client this week. Qwairy is the product that pauses when you query Claude too often. If the deliverable is a defensible tracking slide, start with Peec. If the deliverable is "what do we write next," neither of these closes it alone.
Snapshot comparison
| Qwairy | Peec AI | Promptwatch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free credits; €79/mo | $95/mo | Free Explore; $95/mo Essential |
| Engines | 10+ names; 3 are API-only | 3 included; extras $35 to $165/mo; Claude/DeepSeek Enterprise | 10+ live UIs including Claude |
| Evidence | Responses and sources; no screenshot claim we sourced | Screenshot audit trail | Citations on Essential; crawler logs on Professional |
| Action / content | Content Studio, 50 credits/brief | None (monitoring only) | Content Agents, CMS publish |
| Crawler logs | Business €449 | Not a Peec product | Professional: Agent Analytics, 25M logs |
| G2 | Unpublished here | 4.9/5 | 4.7/5, 1,840+ customers |
| Pause / extras | Pause at 0 credits | Add-on models, no backfill | Prompt/response caps |
Qwairy's case
More engine names at €79 than Peec's three. MCP. A content button, if you have credits. Free poke. That is the Qwairy pitch, and it is why people bounce here after they notice Peec will not write the page.
Peec will not pause your workspace because you queried Claude too often. Qwairy will. Three of Qwairy's engine names are API-only. Content Studio burns 50 credits per brief. Crawler logs wait for Business at €449. G2 is unpublished here. The six-module map reads like a cloned IA.
€79 is not a cheaper Peec. It is a metered suite. If you enjoy feature lists, Qwairy will keep you busy until the credits hit zero.
Peec's case
Agencies bought Peec because the UI is clean and the screenshot exists when a client asks "is this real?" $10M ARR in about 16 months, $29M raised, unlimited seats. Configured coverage runs 30 to 50% above sticker once you add models. Extra engines are $35 to $165 per month. Claude and DeepSeek are Enterprise. There is no historical backfill. There is no "what do we write next" layer.
That last gap is why people bounce to Qwairy's sitemap. They should bounce to Promptwatch instead. Peec is monitoring only. It will not write the page. It will not log crawlers. It will not pause you. It will also not backfill the month before you subscribed.
If the committee already standardized on screenshots, Peec Starter at $95 with three models is a finished tracker. Price the fourth engine before you call it cheaper than anything else.
Promptwatch's case
Same $95 entry as Peec, broader engines, citation analytics, and five articles a month. Essential does not include crawler logs. Professional adds 25M logs at $245. Explore sits underneath. You do not get Peec's screenshot religion or Qwairy's credit pause.
Citation analytics cover pages, domains, Reddit, and YouTube. Content Agents can publish. Agent Analytics begins on Professional for brand plans, rather than on Essential. G2 is 4.7/5 across 1,840+ customers. Prompt and response caps replace a wallet that freezes the workspace.
Who should pick which
Pick Peec if the deliverable is a defensible tracking slide and you will price the extra models. Keep Claude off the shortlist unless you are buying Enterprise. Do not expect a content studio.
Pick Qwairy if you enjoy feature lists. Use the free credits. Do not treat €79 as a Peec substitute.
Pick Promptwatch if you wanted Peec's job plus Qwairy's brochure without either trap. Same sticker as Peec Starter, more engines, a publish loop, and no pause.
A team that already lives in Peec can stay there for screenshots and add Promptwatch when citations, crawls, and drafts matter. A team that only opened Qwairy because Peec felt "monitoring-only" should skip the clone and go to the stack.
FAQ
Is Qwairy a cheaper Peec?
No. Peec is a tracker. Qwairy is a metered suite. $95 Peec with three models is a different SKU than €79 and 1,300 credits.
Can Peec replace Qwairy's content studio?
No. Peec will not write the page. Promptwatch Content Agents will.
Do I get screenshots on Promptwatch?
No screenshot claim is sourced for Promptwatch the way Peec sells an audit trail. Essential includes citation analytics. Professional adds crawler logs instead of Peec-style screenshots.