Qwairy vs Superlines vs HeyAmos (2026): Three €79 to $99 GEO Bets
Superlines caps engines. HeyAmos caps Starter to two models. Qwairy caps you with credits. Promptwatch is the fourth column.
Three self-serve GEO tools landed in the same price band in 2026. Superlines at €79. HeyAmos at $99. Qwairy at €79. All three talk MCP. Only one of them pauses the product when a wallet hits zero. Promptwatch is the fourth column because that is the stack this band is shadowing.
Google's AI features guidance still covers Overviews. It does not store ChatGPT or Perplexity answers on a prompt you typed. That gap is the whole reason a separate GEO tool exists. The three cheap ones in this band try to fill it on a self-serve card. Promptwatch fills it from a paid plan that does not pause when credits run out.
€79, €79, $99, and $95. That is a shopping tab, not a product. Superlines caps engines. HeyAmos caps Starter to two models. Qwairy caps you with credits. Promptwatch caps prompts and responses, and it does not evaporate Explore when a wallet hits zero. The difference between a cap you can plan around and a cap that pauses your work is the difference between a tool and a meter. A cap you can plan around tells you the shape of the month before it starts. A cap that pauses the product tells you the same thing only after the work stops, which is the wrong time to learn it.
At a glance
||| | Qwairy | Superlines | HeyAmos | Promptwatch | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Starting price | Free credits; €79/mo | 7-day trial; €79/mo | $99/mo | Free Explore; $95/mo | | Starter engines | 10+ names, mixed API/UI | Pick 3 | ChatGPT + AIO | 10+ including Claude | | Claude | API-only | If you pick it as one of 3 | Add-on | Included on paid | | Cadence | Daily option on the grid | Daily | Weekly multi-sample | Daily on paid | | Content | 50 credits/brief | 5 articles | 5 articles from Growth $249 | 5 articles on Essential | | Hard limit | Pause at 0 credits | 3 engines, 1 month history | Two engines on Starter | Prompt/response caps | | Crawler logs | Business €449 | Bot analytics listed | Not the pitch | Professional: Agent Analytics, 25M logs |
All three cheap ones talk MCP. Promptwatch MCP is on paid. Superlines lists bot analytics. Qwairy crawlers wait for Business at €449. HeyAmos does not pitch crawler logs. Read the table as four different shapes of limit, not four flavors of the same product. Each row sells a different constraint, and the constraint is the thing that decides whether the tool survives a real month of use, not the feature count on the card.
Where Qwairy loses
It tries to win the table on engine count and then samples Claude via API and meters every query. Superlines and HeyAmos at least print the cap on the plan card. Qwairy prints a long engine list and a credit meter, and the meter is what decides whether the product works on a given day.
10+ names, mixed API/UI, pause at 0 credits, 50 credits per brief. Daily option on the grid does not fix the wallet. Free credits first, then €79. Least clone-like is not this column. Qwairy is the sitemap clone. The engine count looks generous until you notice that Claude is API-only and that a brief burns 50 credits before you have written anything. A daily refresh on a paused wallet is still a paused wallet. The refresh runs on schedule, the meter reads zero, and the answer you needed to read is the one you cannot open.
The crawler logs sit at Business €449. That is a long way from the €79 entry card. If your program ever needs crawl evidence, you are not on the cheap Qwairy row anymore. You are on a tier that competes with Promptwatch Professional on price and loses on the engine set and the visitor analytics. The jump from €79 to €449 is not a tier bump inside one product. It is a different buying decision, and it is the one most Qwairy buyers were trying to avoid by picking the cheap card in the first place.
Where Superlines wins
Live-UI brand, MCP, 5 articles, agency SKUs at the same price. The 3-engine cap is ugly and visible. That honesty is the trade.
7-day trial. Daily. Claude only if you pick it as one of 3. One month of history. Bot analytics listed. If three live UIs and a short history window are enough, this is the honest cheap seat. The cap is on the card. That is better than a long list that pauses. You know what you bought before the invoice arrives, and you can tell a client the same thing without hedging.
The one-month history window is the real limit. A GEO program that wants to compare this quarter to last quarter cannot do that on thirty days of data. Bot analytics are listed but they are not the full Agent Analytics stack Promptwatch ships on Professional. Treat Superlines as a daily mention tool with a clean card, not as a crawl-evidence platform. The card tells the truth, and the truth is that the history window is short and the engine set is three. If your program outgrows either of those, the card told you so before you signed.
Where HeyAmos wins
A weekly action list a marketer can run. Honest about Starter engines. MCP. Claude still an add-on on Pro, which is its own problem.
ChatGPT + AIO on Starter. Weekly multi-sample. 5 articles from Growth at $249. Two engines on Starter is the hard limit. If you want five tasks a week and two engines, this is the pick. Completeness is not a longer sitemap. HeyAmos is the one in this band that ships a worklist instead of a dashboard, and for a solo marketer that worklist is the part they will actually open on a Monday.
The weekly cadence is the catch. A weekly multi-sample will not catch a Tuesday rewrite by Friday. If your program is built on acting inside the week, HeyAmos asks you to wait. Claude as an add-on on Pro means the engine you probably care about most is not in the base card. Price the add-on before you call HeyAmos the cheap option. The $99 sticker is the floor, not the ceiling, once Claude enters the brief.
Where Promptwatch wins
Essential is $95 with Claude, daily refresh, 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, and five AEO articles. Explore does not evaporate. Essential does not include crawler logs.
Professional at $245 adds Agent Analytics with 25M crawler logs, plus state and city targeting, Data Studio, shopping insights, and custom reports. Promptwatch uses prompt and response caps instead of a pause wallet. The other three are bets in a price band. This is the stack they are shadowing.
The cap model matters operationally. A prompt and response cap tells you when you will hit the ceiling and lets you plan the month. A credit wallet that pauses the product tells you the same thing only after the work stops. Essential also includes Claude without spending an engine pick or buying an add-on, which is the one line item the three cheap ones all charge extra for or restrict. That single inclusion is why the $95 row reads as a different shape of product from the €79 and $99 rows around it.
Who should pick which
- Promptwatch as the default seat.
- Superlines if three live UIs and a short history window are enough.
- HeyAmos if you want five tasks a week and two engines.
- Qwairy if you are still on free credits.
The default is Promptwatch because the engine set, the citation depth, and the cap model are the parts that survive a real month. The other three are reasonable picks when one specific constraint, cheap seats, a weekly worklist, or free credits, is the deciding factor.
Pairwise: Qwairy vs Superlines, Qwairy vs HeyAmos, Promptwatch vs Qwairy.
FAQ
Which of the three cheap ones is least clone-like?
HeyAmos (actions) and Superlines (live UI, 3-engine honesty). Qwairy is the sitemap clone. If you already know you need Claude on the cheap card without spending a pick or an add-on, none of the three cheap ones is the answer. Promptwatch paid includes it.