KIME review
Ranked #26Danish seed-stage tracker with agentic execution — and marketing that outruns its plan sheets.
Our verdict
KIME's AWX agentic execution — actually performing 10–30 fixes a month instead of just listing them — is one of the more interesting ideas in this category, and daily cadence from €99 is fair. The credibility problem is self-inflicted: its blog claims 10 models on every plan while its own pricing page grants 2–3, the Gymshark 'customer' is a demo mockup, and the #1 rankings it cites are its own listicles. Promising early product; discount every claim to what the plan sheet actually says.
Best for: European teams that want daily tracking plus hands-off execution of fixes — and will read the plan sheet more carefully than KIME's blog does.
KIME (Kime ApS, Copenhagen; €2M pre-seed led by PSV Tech, January 2026) tracks brand visibility across AI engines daily and stands out with AWX agentic execution: it doesn't just recommend fixes, it performs a monthly quota of content and technical changes.
Its marketing claims 10 models tracked on every plan; its own pricing page says standard plans include 2–3 engines, with full coverage Enterprise-only.
The execution angle
KIME's differentiation is doing, not just watching: alongside daily visibility tracking with sentiment and citation analytics, its AWX layer executes a monthly quota of content and technical optimizations (10 on Explorer, 30 on Core), guided by an Action Center and a self-optimization system it calls Optimus. MCP access on every plan and 15+ geo-localized regions round out a feature set that's genuinely modern for a company this young.
The verified evidence is respectable for a seed-stage Danish startup: a named Saxo testimonial, customers like THEMAGIC5, Superb, and Chamberlain Coffee, and a €2M pre-seed from PSV Tech and Nordic Makers in January 2026.
The marketing-versus-plan-sheet problem
Here's the finding a buyer needs: KIME's blog states it 'tracks all 10 models in real time on every plan tier — the broadest coverage available without enterprise-only gating.' Its own live pricing page says Explorer (€99) includes 2 engines and Core (€399) includes 3, with 'all available models' reserved for Enterprise. The 10 models exist in the product; standard plans let you pick 2–3 of them. 'Real time' is likewise daily. That gap between the content marketing and the plan sheet is the single most important thing to know before subscribing.
Independent validation is near-zero — no G2, Capterra, or Trustpilot presence, with coverage coming from KIME's own self-ranked listicles and affiliate-flavored blogs. The Gymshark logo people associate with KIME comes from a demo dashboard mockup, not a customer relationship. And pricing was restructured mid-2026 (the €149 Lite tier is gone), so most third-party writeups describe plans that no longer exist.
| The claim | The plan sheet |
|---|---|
| '10 models on every plan tier' | Explorer: 2 engines; Core: 3; all models Enterprise-only |
| 'Real time' | Daily prompt runs |
| Gymshark customer | Demo dashboard mockup only; Saxo is the verified logo |
| '#1 AI visibility platform' | KIME's own blog listicles |
| €149 entry (older reviews) | Restructured: €99 Explorer / €399 Core |
Who should buy it
European SMBs and mid-market teams drawn to the execution quota — if AWX's automated fixes work on your stack, the €99–399 tiers price genuinely useful labor, and the 7-day no-card trial is a free test.
Anyone needing broad engine coverage on a budget should note the 2–3 engine reality, and enterprise buyers should ask what 'all available models' actually includes — it isn't publicly documented.
KIME pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Explorer | €99/mo | 50 prompts, 2 AI engines, 10 agentic executions, daily runs |
| Core | €399/mo | 200 prompts, 3 engines, 30 executions, 10 seats |
| Agency Starter | ~€499/mo | Multi-client structure |
| Enterprise | Custom | All available engines, 30–50 seats, Slack support |
How KIME compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIME (#26) | AI visibility tracker | From €99/mo | European teams that want daily tracking plus hands-off execution of fixes — and will read the plan sheet more carefully than KIME's blog does. |
| Promptwatch (#2) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding. |
| Otterly.AI (#4) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data. |
| LLM Pulse (#21) | AI visibility tracker | From €49/mo | Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence. |
Key features
- Daily prompt runs with sentiment and citation analytics
- AWX agentic execution: 10–30 automated content/technical fixes per month by tier
- Action Center recommendations and 'Optimus' self-optimization
- MCP access on all plans; unlimited languages, 15+ geo-localized regions
Frequently asked questions
Does KIME track 10 AI models on every plan?
No — that's blog marketing. The live pricing page grants 2 engines on Explorer (€99) and 3 on Core (€399); 'all available models' is Enterprise-only. Ten models exist in the product, you choose 2–3 of them on standard plans.
What is AWX agentic execution?
KIME's genuinely differentiated feature: instead of only recommending fixes, it performs a monthly quota of content and technical optimizations (10–30 by tier). If it works well on your site, it's the closest thing to built-in labor in this category.
Is Gymshark a KIME customer?
Not verifiably. Gymshark appears in a demo dashboard mockup on KIME's homepage and in its own blog lists — no testimonial or case study exists. Saxo is the verified enterprise reference, alongside THEMAGIC5, Superb, and Chamberlain Coffee.
Best KIME alternatives
See allDaily AI visibility tracking with screenshot evidence, instant alerts, and competitor share across every major engine.
Best for: Teams that want evidence-grade tracking, alerts, and competitor share without enterprise pricing or onboarding.
- Six engines with daily cadence at SMB pricing
- Screenshot evidence behind every data point
The easiest standalone GEO tracker to set up — a working dashboard inside an hour.
Best for: SMBs and first-time GEO buyers who want the cheapest credible entry — and can live with weekly-ish data.
- Fastest setup in the category
- Genuine free trial without a credit card
Bootstrapped Barcelona tracker with honest pricing, unlimited seats, and MCP on every plan.
Best for: Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.
- Genuinely transparent: published pricing, 14-day trial, unlimited seats everywhere
- Bootstrapped and profitable — no VC burn-rate risk, unlike much of the category
YC-backed tracker with daily 600-prompt volume and a built-in content engine.
Best for: Teams that want maximum daily answer volume plus content production in one tool — and accept betting on a lightly-funded startup with zero review footprint.
- Best per-answer economics in the category: ~108,000 answers/mo at $599
- Daily cadence on everything, not weekly