Best Am I Cited Alternatives in 2026
Am I Cited covers eight engines on a credit model. The alternatives depend on whether you need a full platform, an action queue, crawler side serving, or a different tracker shape.
Am I Cited is a credit based AI visibility platform that covers eight engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Grok. One AI response is one prompt run on one engine, and credits cover responses, agent runs, and AI articles. Starter is from 50 euros per month with 50 credits, 3,000 AI responses, one domain, 200 prompts, 10 competitors, and 10 AI articles. A seven day free trial covers one domain, five prompts, and three articles with no card.
The strength is the broad engine spread at a low entry price. The limits are the ones the listing names plainly: no published AI crawler log product, no published visitor analytics that join AI referred sessions to conversions, no Content Agents that publish GEO pages to Webflow or Framer through a review inbox, and an MCP server gated at Enterprise. Credits also do not roll over. If you are shopping Am I Cited alternatives, the question is whether you need the measurement and workflow layers it does not publish, or a different tracker shape. These are the alternatives worth shortlisting in 2026.
Promptwatch
Promptwatch is the full AI visibility platform and the first alternative to evaluate. It tracks prompts with search volumes, difficulty scores, and query fan outs across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, and Copilot, plus Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, so the engine list is wider than Am I Cited's eight. It does citation analytics at the page and domain level, Reddit and YouTube citations, offsite mentions, and citation type breakdowns, with a citation trends view. It runs Agent Analytics, the real time AI crawler log layer that logs ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and the Meta AI crawler, with a crawl to citation path and error tracking. It runs visitor analytics that connect AI referred sessions to conversions. And it runs Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO optimized content to Webflow or Framer, with WordPress listed as coming soon, through a review inbox.
The MCP server is the part Am I Cited gates at Enterprise. Promptwatch ships a hosted streamable HTTP MCP server at https://server.promptwatch.com/mcp, with OAuth or Bearer key auth, exposed from the entry paid plan. Read only keys hide the write tools. Explore is free, and paid brand plans start at $95 per month.
AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ is the action queue alternative. Built by ex Google Search and DeepMind engineers, it tracks brand appearances across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and AI Overviews and rolls everything into a unified GEO score. Its Action Center is the differentiator: visibility data becomes assignable tasks, like schema generation, content reformatting, and LLM metadata optimization. Starter runs $295 per month, with a free Essential tier of roughly 300 credits. The catch is credit based billing, which G2 reviewers report burning faster than the calculator suggests, and the features reviewers praise sit in an Enterprise tier reported around $2,000+ per month.
Scrunch AI
Scrunch AI is the crawler side alternative. Its Agent Experience Platform serves AI optimized versions of your pages to LLM crawlers without touching the human facing site, which is a lever no dashboard can pull. Engine coverage scales up to nine on the Enterprise tier. Starter runs $250 per month billed annually with three seats and 350 custom prompts. The monitoring half draws consistent G2 criticism for weak reporting and per engine credit burn, and the June 2026 Sitecore acquisition ties the roadmap to a DXP vendor. Buy it for the serving layer if you have engineering support.
Profound
Profound is the enterprise marketing agent alternative, and it sits below the dedicated platforms above. It runs scheduled prompts across ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude, and up to 10 engines on Enterprise, with a Prompt Volumes dataset of real query demand. The live product is sold as marketing agents for AEO, content, demand, and PR, so AI search is one channel rather than the whole product. Public Starter is $99 per month billed yearly and ChatGPT only with 50 prompts. Growth is $399 per month yearly for three engines. The Profound that wins awards, with 10 engines, full Prompt Volumes, API, and SSO, is Enterprise and starts around $40k a year. It is a heavy enterprise buy, not a self serve tracker.
The narrower trackers
Otterly.AI and Peec AI are the single brand trackers at the bottom of the shortlist. Otterly is the cheapest on ramp at $29 per month, with a genuine no card trial and a working dashboard in an hour, but its data can lag up to seven days and the headline six engine list is really four base engines with Gemini, Claude, and AI Mode as paid add ons. Peec has the cleanest tracking UX in the category and a 4.9 on G2, but each tier includes only three of six plus models, with extra models costing $35 to $165 per month each, so real bills land 30 to 50 percent above sticker. They are good first tools for a single brand. They are not the full platform.
How to choose
The split is by job. If you want the full measurement and publishing platform, Promptwatch is the alternative that closes the loop Am I Cited leaves open. If you want an action queue, AthenaHQ is the workflow tool, budgeted for the real tier. If you want to serve optimized pages to crawlers, Scrunch AI is the serving layer. If you are an enterprise buying a marketing agent program, Profound is the heavy platform. If you just want a cheap tracker for one brand, Otterly or Peec are the on ramps. For most teams that have outgrown Am I Cited's credit math, the platform that measures and publishes in one invoice is the one that holds up, and that is Promptwatch.