Aibevolen review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #116Dutch GEO service for local SMEs: weekly ChatGPT and Perplexity measurement with source URLs from 30 EUR, or full management at 199 EUR.
Our verdict
Aibevolen is for the Dutch dentist or lawyer who wants to know whether ChatGPT recommends them and would rather pay 199 EUR a month for someone to fix it than learn schema markup. The weekly two-engine measurement with source URLs is honest and the benchmark is useful context. It is not a tool for marketing teams. Those teams, and agencies serving them, will want Promptwatch: daily real-UI monitoring across the full engine list, crawler logs, AI-referred conversions and Content Agents, from a company also founded in the Netherlands.
Best for: Dutch local service businesses who want someone to measure AI recommendations weekly and, if they choose, implement the schema, content and directory fixes for them.
Aibevolen (aibevolen.nl) is a Dutch service, not a SaaS dashboard, aimed at local businesses such as dentists, salons, lawyers and restaurants. A free 30-second check via Perplexity shows whether AI names you for 'best [trade] in [town]' and which competitors it names instead, with the source URLs the answer relied on. Subscribers are measured weekly via ChatGPT and Perplexity, and the company publishes a public GEO benchmark of Dutch SMEs: of 170 companies it tested, 74% did not appear for any query of that type.
Monitoring is 30 EUR/mo (or 360 EUR a year): weekly measurement, a technical basis check, a client portal with score history, alerts when you enter or drop out of answers, and an action list you execute yourself. A one-time implementation of the fixes is 500 EUR, reduced to 300 EUR with a monthly subscription or 200 EUR with an annual one. Volledig beheer (full management) is 199 EUR/mo, cancellable monthly, and the team implements improvements each month: schema.org and llms.txt, content, and external mentions on the sources AI cites. The score out of 100 weights AI mentions 60, FAQ content 20 and technical basis 20.
Aibevolen is the done-for-you option for a Dutch local business with no marketing team. It covers two engines weekly and has no software depth. Promptwatch is the Dutch-founded platform for teams that want to run this themselves at scale.
Check, monitoring, implementation, management
aibevolen.nl (reviewed 2026-09-12). The free check takes your company name, website, sector and location and returns within 30 seconds, via Perplexity, whether AI names you for sector queries, which competitors it names and the source URLs. Monitoring is 30 EUR a month or 360 EUR a year: weekly measurement via Perplexity and ChatGPT, technical basis check, client portal with score history, alerts, and an action list you execute yourself. The full audit is a PDF with 15 simulated customer queries, your score, the top 10 competitors and 5 to 10 improvement actions.
One-time implementation is 500 EUR, or 300 EUR with a monthly subscription and 200 EUR with an annual one. Volledig beheer is 199 EUR a month, cancellable monthly: the team implements improvements each month across technical work (schema.org, llms.txt), content and external mentions on the sources AI cites. The company is run by Hubert Getrouw (KvK 86958100). It states that in May 2026 it blind-tested its scoring against ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity with live web access and that 88 to 92% of top-scoring companies were named; that is the vendor's own test.
Service depth versus platform depth
What Aibevolen does well is grounding. Each competitor in your report is traceable to a real page, each recommendation names the directory or review site the AI actually pulled from (Google Maps, Zorgkaart Nederland, Trustpilot, Tripadvisor in the demo), and the portal shows the literal AI answer per assistant. The published benchmark of 170 Dutch SMEs, 74% unmentioned for 'best [sector] in [town]', is the kind of local context a national tool does not have.
Depth is the trade-off. Two engines measured weekly is a narrow window, the higher tiers are human labour rather than software, and there is nothing below the answer: no crawler-log view of AI bot hits, no crawl-to-citation path, no conversion attribution, no API. Promptwatch publishes real-UI monitoring across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot and Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Agent Analytics with named CDN integrations, visitor analytics with conversions and Content Agents to Webflow and Framer, for teams that want to run the programme themselves.
Aibevolen pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free check | 0 EUR | 30-second Perplexity check with competitors and source URLs |
| Monitoring | 30 EUR/mo or 360 EUR/yr | Weekly ChatGPT + Perplexity measurement, technical check, portal, alerts, action list |
| One-time implementation | 500 EUR (300 EUR monthly subscriber, 200 EUR annual) | Audit within 30 minutes of payment, then fixes implemented once |
| Volledig beheer | 199 EUR/mo | Monthly implementation of schema.org, llms.txt, content and external mentions; weekly measurement; cancel monthly |
How Aibevolen compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aibevolen (#116) | GEO service | From 30 EUR/mo; full management 199 EUR/mo | Dutch local service businesses who want someone to measure AI recommendations weekly and, if they choose, implement the schema, content and directory fixes for them. |
| Promptwatch (#1) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| GetCito (#112) | GEO service | Free self-host; managed from $599/mo | Teams that will either run the open-source tracker themselves or pay agency rates for humans to do GEO. |
| OneLittleWeb (#113) | GEO service | Custom; no public GEO rate card | Teams that want to buy backlinks and GEO execution from an agency, not a login to a prompt tracker. |
Key features
- Free 30-second check via Perplexity with competitors and traceable source URLs; weekly measurement via ChatGPT and Perplexity for subscribers
- Client portal with weekly score, sector average nationally and regionally, sources AI cites, literal AI answers and a per-measurement log
- Score out of 100: AI mentions 60, FAQ content 20, technical basis 20; alerts on entering or leaving answers or a new competitor
- Full audit as PDF: 15 simulated customer queries, score, top 10 competitors, 5 to 10 concrete actions; KvK data plus ready-to-use schema.org code
- One-time implementation or monthly full management covering schema.org, llms.txt, content and external mentions
Frequently asked questions
Which AI assistants does Aibevolen measure?
Subscribers are measured weekly via ChatGPT and Perplexity, with the source URLs retrieved for each answer. The free check uses Perplexity only.
Is Aibevolen a software tool or a service?
Both, in layers. Monitoring at 30 EUR is a portal with weekly measurements and an action list. Implementation and Volledig beheer are services where the team does the work. There is no API or self-serve platform described.
Does Aibevolen have AI crawler logs or conversion tracking?
No. It measures recommendations and technical basics. It does not publish AI crawler logs or visitor analytics that attribute AI-referred sessions to conversions. Promptwatch publishes both.
Best Aibevolen alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
MIT-licensed tracker you can self-host for free — or $599/mo for a human GEO team that writes the pages.
Best for: Teams that will either run the open-source tracker themselves or pay agency rates for humans to do GEO.
- Actual free software, not a 7-day trial — MIT self-host
- Paid plans publish hours and content counts, not just 'custom'
Link-building and SEO agency that also sells GEO retainers. Not a self-serve visibility platform.
Best for: Teams that want to buy backlinks and GEO execution from an agency, not a login to a prompt tracker.
- Clear about being an agency: humans, outreach, and PR, not a SaaS SKU
- GEO measurement list is written down (mentions, citations, schema, entities, ChatGPT referrals)
San Francisco SEO and GEO agency with embedded sprint teams. Not a self-serve visibility platform, and no public rate card.
Best for: Enterprise or mid-market teams that want embedded SEO/GEO humans on a 12-month retainer, and already have (or will buy) a measurement platform separately.
- Clear about being labor: three engagement models, no pretend SaaS checkout
- Named enterprise case studies (Atlassian, Sage, Kindo) sit on the live site