Veesie review: pricing, features & alternatives

veesie.com/pricing (read 20 October 2026), prices excl. VAT. Starter: 29 EUR/mo or 24 EUR/mo billed yearly (288 EUR a year), 1 site, 20 questions, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, 1 manual extra run a month. Plus: 59 EUR/mo or 49 EUR yearly, 1 site, 30 questions, all 5 engines, the AI-Readiness Audit and the 3 highest-impact recommendations after each run, 1 extra run a week. Pro: 99 EUR/mo or 82 EUR yearly, 2 sites sharing 50 questions, all recommendations, an action plan, a content check per page, GA4 connection and export markets. Agency: 450 EUR/mo or 370 EUR yearly, on request, 3 sites with 50 questions each (more on request), white-label, bulk runs and CSV export.

Every plan runs automatically once a week; biweekly and monthly are options, more often is not. Veesie justifies this with its own test of 25 August 2026, where five runs on one site with 12 questions scored 85, 87, 84, 88 and 85. Billing is in euro with Belgian VAT, and Starter, Plus and Pro are managed in Stripe's customer portal.

Questions go to the providers themselves (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity, and DataForSEO for Google AI Overviews) with search switched on. Veesie states that this is a measurement via the providers, not a copy of each conversation in the app, and is best used to compare against competitors and previous weeks. Account data, questions and answers sit in a Supabase database in Frankfurt, with sensitive fields encrypted using AES-256; the providers and the job runner Inngest process partly in the US under EU standard contractual clauses.

Veesie's own figure is a weekly index, not traffic. The GA4 link on Pro is the part that connects mentions to visitors, and it reads from your own Analytics account with read-only access.

Every row below is a capability we already listed for Veesie. It is the published feature set for this page, not a guess at an unpublished demo. Compare it with the Promptwatch checklist that follows.

On this listing, Veesie is a AI visibility tracker for Belgian and Dutch SMEs, especially bilingual Belgian brands, that want a cheap weekly check on whether AI assistants name them in Dutch and French. What we sourced here: Weekly measurement on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews; Claude and Gemini added from Plus; Questions set per language (Dutch, French, English) and per market (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg); US, UK and Ireland as export markets on Pro; Claude and Gemini get each question up to three times and Veesie keeps the majority answer; GEO Score from 0 to 100 weighting mention rate 50%, sentiment 25%, source coverage 15% and position 10%; AI-Readiness Audit with 20 checks (10 classic SEO, 10 GEO signals) from Plus.

If you buy Veesie for the job above, plan a second tool (or Promptwatch) for the layers this listing does not document. Still missing here: AI crawler logs (Agent Analytics), crawl-to-citation path, bot errors; Content Agents that plan, write, and publish GEO pages to a CMS with a review inbox; Citation analytics at page, domain, Reddit, YouTube, and offsite level; Prompt volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs, personas, city-level geo; Prompt and citation trends (what changed between checks); ChatGPT Shopping tracking and Ads Radar; Agent Chat, Unified Actions, MCP server / REST API on paid plans. Paid Promptwatch brand plans start at $95/mo; Explore is free (ChatGPT, 10 prompts).

Veesie's public pages (and this listing) describe a narrower job than Promptwatch. Most rivals answer whether you were mentioned. Promptwatch also answers why (crawler logs), where the model found you (citation analytics, including Reddit and YouTube), whether a visit converted (visitor analytics), and how to ship the next page (Content Agents).

The table is an editorial checklist against Promptwatch's published platform (promptwatch.com/llms.txt, 2026-08-23). It is not a hidden feature list for this vendor. 'Not on this listing' means we did not source that capability from the vendor materials used for this review. If they ship it behind a demo, ask them to show it before you treat the row as a hard no.