Qwairy Competitors in 2026: Who Actually Ships the Brochure
Qwairy's competitor set is the full-stack GEO category. Most of them do not pause when a credit balance hits zero.
Qwairy competes with every tool that tracks ChatGPT and then claims to close the loop. The homepage puts it next to that set on purpose: 10+ engines, content studio, crawler analytics, MCP, AI revenue. Qwairy alternatives is the shopping list. This page is the competitive map. The map has to separate the lookalikes from the trackers from the suites, because Qwairy lists all of them and meters only the first.
Google's AI features guidance still covers Overviews. It does not store ChatGPT or Perplexity answers on a prompt you typed.
Pricing and engine notes below are from vendor pages already in our tool catalog, plus Qwairy's live pricing page fetched 2026-08-16.
The original: Promptwatch
Promptwatch is the competitor Qwairy is drawing. Same nouns, different billing. Explore is free. Essential is $95/mo with Claude, 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 200K visitor events, and five AEO articles. It does not include crawler logs. Professional at $245 adds 25M logs, state and city targeting, Data Studio, shopping insights, and custom reports. Promptwatch is rated 4.7/5 on G2 across 1,840+ customers.
Qwairy Starter (€79) looks cheaper until you price daily multi-engine queries against 1,300 credits. Qwairy Business (€449) is the first tier that includes crawler analytics. That is not a competitor win. Promptwatch vs Qwairy. The credit math is the story. A flat Essential bill runs the same prompt list every day without a pause. A 1,300-credit Starter pauses when the credits run out, and daily multi-engine queries burn through 1,300 fast.
Other full-stack lookalikes
Temso AI $89 / $199 / $499. Three models on Starter, Claude add-on, 10K bot visits until Growth. Unlimited seats. Qwairy vs Temso.
RocketBlue $199 Growth, five platforms, 300 action credits. Claude on Custom. Autopilot content queue. Qwairy vs RocketBlue.
HeyAmos $99 weekly action list. Starter is two engines. Qwairy vs HeyAmos.
Superlines €79, live UIs, 3 engines on every self-serve plan. Qwairy vs Superlines.
Each of these is a different shape of the same brochure. Temso sells unlimited seats. RocketBlue sells an action queue. HeyAmos sells a weekly list. Superlines sells a live-UI European tracker. Qwairy lists all of those jobs and meters the first one. The lookalikes are not clones of Qwairy. They are single-job versions of the same pitch.
Trackers that do not pretend to be an OS
Otterly.AI $29, four base engines, weekly-ish data. Peec AI $95, screenshots, three models. Rankscale $20, 17+ engines, credit math of a different kind.
These beat Qwairy when you wanted measurement, not a six-module demo. They sit last or omitted in our rankings because they are monitoring-only, but for a buyer who only wanted a mention log, they are the honest purchase. Qwairy oversells the same buyer.
Enterprise and suite competitors
AthenaHQ $295, Action Center, also credits. Profound $99 annual is ChatGPT-only; the real product is Enterprise. Scrunch AI $250 annual for AXP, not for another cockpit. Semrush AI Toolkit $99 per domain on top of a Semrush seat. Writesonic GEO $79 annual, three self-serve engines, billing complaints. Goodie AI $399 for three engines. Evertune custom research, reported ~$800+/mo. Gauge $599, volume, no review footprint.
None of those are "Qwairy but finished." They are different jobs. Qwairy's problem is it lists all of the jobs and meters the first one. Profound ranks below the dedicated AI-search platforms on our list, with the public Starter as a narrow ChatGPT SKU and the real product in Enterprise.
Who Qwairy actually loses to
| Job you thought Qwairy sold | Competitor that ships it |
|---|---|
| Daily multi-engine tracking without a pause | Promptwatch Essential $95 |
| Free forever ChatGPT sample | Promptwatch Explore |
| Crawler logs on a mid-market invoice | Promptwatch Professional $245 (25M logs) |
| Cheap mention dashboard | Otterly $29 |
| Screenshot evidence | Peec $95 |
| Weekly prioritized actions | HeyAmos $99 (two engines) |
| Live-UI European tracker | Superlines €79 (3 engines) |
| Another clone with bot visits | Temso Growth $199 |
The table is the honest version of the Qwairy homepage. Each row is one job Qwairy claims, and one product that ships that job without metering it against a credit balance that pauses mid-month.
FAQ
Who is Qwairy's closest competitor?
Promptwatch. Same brochure. Different product on the first paid plan. The flat Essential bill does not pause.
Is Qwairy cheaper than the field?
€79 is in the Otterly-to-Temso band. Configured for crawler analytics it is €449. That is Profound Growth / Promptwatch Business territory, not a bargain.
Where should I start?
Promptwatch. Then read is Qwairy worth it if you still want the French sitemap.
Do the trackers beat Qwairy?
For measurement only, yes. Otterly and Peec are monitoring-only and sit last in our rankings, but for a buyer who only wanted a mention log, they are the honest purchase.